Monday, December 27, 2010

Revival of an abandoned project - Taman Pekatra, Simpang Empat




救槟停顿15年房屋计划有功 白武士免缴罚款
■北马新闻 2010-12-24 00:01:55 点击数:527

■“白武士”挺身拯救的英达花园第2期工程,已获得入伙准证。左起骆彦忠、郭宪钦、黄汉伟、陈诗智及辜义中。

(槟城23日讯)“白武士”挺身拯救被搁置长达15年的房屋计划,获槟州政府破例豁免逾13万令吉前发展商所拖欠的迟缴地税罚款。

自1996年开始被搁置迄今15年的威南新邦安拔打昔英达花园(Taman Perkatra Indah)房屋发展计划,先后更换了6个发展商,最后则被“白武士”SIMCITY-ETE VENTURE成功拯救。

该公司董事郭宪钦今早在槟州房屋委员会主席黄汉伟行政议员召开的记者会上透露,纵使SIMCITY-ETE VENTURE于2007年开始接管,但却因为前发展商所留下的许多手续,包括拖欠地税、银行放贷受阻等问题,导致抢救工程波折连连。

不过随着首期工程(54个单位)顺利在2009年6月取得入伙准证后,该公司再次接获由槟州首长林冠英掌管的土地事务、土地发展委员会,以及黄汉伟掌管的房屋委员会捎来豁免多达13万9669令吉迟缴地税的罚款。

黄汉伟:豁免近14万罚款

黄汉伟补充,州政府破例豁免英达花园拖欠地税的罚款,主要是以购屋者的利益为出发点。“有关地税已随着房屋计划被搁置而拖欠了15年,如今接管的发展商已承担了共22万3512令吉50仙的地税,若连带13万罚款,想必日后也会加诸予购屋者身上。”

他希望日后有更多白武士,愿意挺身而出,协助购屋者拯救被搁置的计划。

如今随着首期双层排屋工程于2009年取得入伙准证后,第二期(74个单位)的工程,也已在本月6日顺利取得入伙准证,至于第3期(91个单位)的工程,目前正如火如荼进行中。

也是该公司董事之一的陈诗智宣称,预计共5期(442个单位)的发展工程,将于2012年中旬全面竣工。

该公司也促请购屋者尽快联络发展商,以便处理购屋问题,联络电话为 04-5010777或 012-4988696。

记者会出席者尚包括董事经理骆彦忠及董事辜义中。

国行应改机制

槟州房屋委员会主席黄汉伟行政议员促请国家银行改善机制,避免银行纯粹以商业为出发点,未人性化看待因房屋工程被搁置而拖欠银行贷款的购屋者。

“我曾接获购屋者投诉,指他们因为购买的房屋计划被搁置后,无力承担银行贷款,而被银行起诉,甚至要求法庭判对方清盘。”

他认为,银行的做法,让无法获得房子却又得面对清盘危机的购屋者,非常不公平。

此外,黄汉伟也呼吁中央房屋及地方政府部能够加强法律,避免国内的房屋发展计划被搁置的情况持续发生。

Gotong Royong - Cleaner Greener Penang campaign

Planting a new tree at Sek.Kebangsaan Batu Lanchang 13 Nov 2010



Gotong Royong at Happy Valley, Air Itam. A good crowd turned up to participate in the Cleaner Greener Campaign.



Friedship and Solidarity

I got to know Mr Cheah Eng Soon at the Law Library, University of Malaya. He was called to the Bar before Yang Arif John O' Haira - the same judge who handled my call three years ago. Congratulations to him.




Visiting DAP comrades on the Deepavali day.

Officiating functions in the month of December

Merayakan Aidil Adha (Hari Raya Haji) at Zoo Road, Air Itam




Opening for Sun Yat Sen Exhibition







孫中山庇能會議圖畫展 黃漢偉:讓青年瞭解歷史
北馬 2010-11-14 20:10
(檳城14 日訊)檳州房屋、城鄉策劃及藝術委員會主席黃漢偉說,孫中山庇能會議100週年紀念圖畫展,主要讓年輕人知道先人曾經為社會的付出,同時也較為全面的了解南洋歷史,不局限於正課中的馬來亞半島歷史。
“我國歷史課本中的歷史著重馬來歷史,將華人的貢獻輕描淡寫的帶過,導致年輕的一輩不了解先人的偉大貢獻。”
他週日在孫中山庇能會議100週年紀念圖畫展開幕禮上說,馬來西亞的文物館及博物館都特別注重馬來人的貢獻,這表示我國的歷史不夠完整性,應該學習珍珠港文物館將2戰的情況,具體、真實的呈現給世人。
他說,孫中山集古今中外的思想精華,包括仁愛、信義、和平、愛國、親民、修身、齊家等道德情操,讓華社的文化、教育及精神能夠在世界立足。
“孫中山除了鼓勵讀書風氣之於,也鼓吹戒菸戒毒等不良嗜好,讓華裔弟子走向光明大道。”

As reported in The Star 18 November 2010

The Penang factor in China’s revolution
By JEREMY TAN

DESPITE having no obvious ties, tiny Penang played a role in shaping the history of the world’s most populous and second largest country, China.

For it was on the island, exactly 100 years ago, that Dr Sun Yat Sen convened the Penang Conference to plan the Second Guangzhou Uprising, a key event that eventually led towards the China Revolution of 1911.

Among the events organised to commemorate the centennial of that pivotal moment in history is an exhibition entitled Sun Yat Sen and Soong Ching Ling Memorials: Their Life and Legacy, at 57 Macalister Road from now until Feb 17.

Organised by Min Sin Seah and supported by the Penang Heritage Trust, Sun Yat Sen Penang Base and Penang Zhongsan Association, it will highlight the significance of Dr Sun’s movement in the histories of Penang and Malaysia, as well as the contributions in Chinese education, press and socio-political movements.

State Town and Country Planning, Housing and Arts Committee chairman Wong Hon Wai said Dr Sun was not only a revolutionist, but also a towering global figure.

“This exhibit provides an important channel for Malaysians to learn more about his contributions,” he said at the exhibition’s opening on Saturday.

Min Sin Seah president and event organising chairman Datuk Dr Yee Thiam Sun said Dr Sun’s struggles epitomised the willingness of the Chinese community’s forefathers to sacrifice their time and efforts in contributing to their homeland.

“China’s history would have been very different had Dr Sun not been successful in the revolution.

“Penang played an important role in China’s history, and we would like to carry on his spirit and perseverance,” he said.

Among the other events held in conjunction with the international centennial celebrations are the 22nd Joint Conference of Sun Yat Sen and Soong Ching Ling Memorials from tomorrow to Monday at City Bayview Hotel and the International Symposium on Sun Yat Sen, Soong Ching Ling and Southeast Asia on Sunday at Wawasan Open University.



Foodsion Food Carnival at Ayer Itam Tua Peh Kong 12-12-2010.





大厨小镇美食慈善嘉年华会绘画赛 黄汉伟:推荐美食分享厨艺 YB夫人也爱看《食尚》
二零一零年十二月十二日 晚上九时二十一分


(槟城12日讯)《食尚》杂志推荐美食、厨艺分享,YB夫人也爱看,从中得到灵感为家人烧饭!

槟州行政议员黄汉伟周日为“大厨小镇美食慈善嘉年华会”绘画比赛主持揭题仪式时披露,其太太爱看《食尚》杂志,看后从中得到灵感和心思,这样他就会“获益良多”,有口福了。

他说,以往的年代,人们填饱肚子就行,惟,现代的人们追求的是人生品质,因此该杂志将会在槟城得到广泛欢迎。他同时希望该杂志走入其它地区,与读者交流,切磋食艺。

大厨小镇美食慈善嘉年华会由食尚杂志主办,《光华日报》为媒体伙伴,在亚依淡福德正神前广场举行。活动包括绘画比赛、儿童游艺节目、美食品尝、产品展示促销、幸运抽奖、心肺复苏法示范等,现场吸引了上千人陆续到访。值得一提的是,大会邀请五星级酒店大厨李明胜前来现场分享厨艺,为民众示范拿手好菜。

Program pendedahan ICT di Kampung Melayu

Mendedahkan penduduk kampung melayu dengan program pendidikan ICT bersama metropolitan college.



Tuesday, November 30, 2010

Weekly column - Inside the State Assembly 我在议会的故事

我在议会的故事

黄汉伟 - 槟州行政议员兼亚依淡州议员

一名曾在槟州发展机构任高职的前辈向我分享了一个故事. 八十年代他是负责准备州议会答案的官员, 有议员书面提问首席部长是否知晓在峇央峇鲁一带非法外劳涌现的现象. 他准备了三页的答案, 长篇大论的论述此现象及解决方案. 他草拟的答案交到任首席部长的敦林苍佑手上. 首长把三页改成一个字 “YA”.

英国议会民主的一个老故事是这样子的. 一名外地驾车人士路过英国国会, 卷下车镜向一名部长问路:“我现在在那里了?” 部长回答: “ 你坐在车里.” 绝对精准的答案, 没有多余 的描述, 这是英国议会民主发明的书面提问及答案的示范. 提问的议员如果没有做足功课, 加强询问的技巧, 就会得到绝对精准的答案, 但没有可用资讯的局面.

要评估议员问政的认真度可从他提的议会问题看出他对于各议题的关心, 对掌握某课题的深度以及是否有持之有恒的态度. 举个例, 有议员是打游击的, 是为了凑足其询问问题的固打而问问题. 在上一季问了个问题得到不满意的答案, 在下一季就若无其事的不闻不问. 有持之有恒的议员会继续追踪课题, 继续询问, 批评及给予意见如何改善.

我时常提醒负责议会事项的公务员, 议员提的问题可能是二年前已经问过了, 但不要准备与二年前一样的答案. 这跟大学经济系的出考题角度一样. 题目可能与往年一样, 但把去年的答案重复放在今年的话, 那是学养不足, 未能与时并进的现象.

议员提问有分口头询问及书面询问. 口头询问须单刀直入问特定课题, 要求以描述性的答案. 书面询问可以要求有关数据及技术性的答案. 问问题不是为了符合题目固打, 而是为了准备在辩论环节可引经据典, 引述官方数字来加强辩论的力度.

我在今年十一月的槟州议会回答了三个口头问题, 三十题的书面问题, 做了一个45分钟的部门总结, 参与一个提案辩论及提议及总结一个法案.

最令我回味的是巴当拉浪州议员陈宗兴口头询问产业泡沫化的政府对策. 我把公务员提供的范本搁一旁, 亲自起草答案. 柑仔园州议员嘉迪星律师书面提问有关大英义学院组屋的分层地契的书面回答不够完整而我在总结时亲自起草答案花了10分钟描述入伙准证从80年代到至今的演变史, 还有与具有律师资格的直落达哇州议员查哈拉短兵相接的提案辩论有关房屋法令与联邦宪法相容性的辩论. 她挑了三个问题, 我逐一反驳. 她总结提案没有对我的反驳发言, 但挑起其他新课题.

大部分人的刻板印象是州议会辩论一团糟, 媒体须负部分责任. 如只把聚点放在口舌之争, 我不排除台湾议员打架事项会发生. 原因是理性辩论连报屁股都上不到, 只有打架才能上封面.

Sunday, November 07, 2010

Singapore, HK provide models for Penang Housing Board

As reported in the Edge By Regina William
Friday, 29 October 2010 18:57

GEORGE TOWN: Penang is setting up its own Penang Housing Board (PHB), modelled after the successful Singapore Housing Development Board (HDB) and Hong Kong Housing Authority (HKHA) in a long term bid to streamline the development of housing and plan more affordable housing in the state.

While the housing boards in Singapore and Hong Kong, both islands, were set up in 1960 and 1973 respectively, Penang is belatedly starting the ball rolling and hopes to build up its expertise and gather momentum over the years.

The state government is expected to table a motion at the legislative assembly sitting on Monday for the PHB to be set up as a statutory body.

With land for development in short supply on the island, affordable housing has been a scarce commodity. Developers, especially the major players, have preferred to focus on luxury homes and super condominiums to leverage on the high land costs.

The proposed housing board is envisaged to deal with all issues relating to government housing and also play an active role in private housing.

State housing committee chairman Wong Hon Wai told The Edge Financial Daily that currently the state housing department was under the purview of the State Secretary’s office.

“Due to the constant change in the civil service where officers come and go, the state government feels there should be a dedicated unit to oversee housing activities in the state.

“The current setup has a limited role and is only maintaining public housing schemes while the private housing sector is managed by the respective building management establishments.

“Once you have a housing board, it can play a prominent and collective role.

“We are looking at Singapore and Hong Kong which have dedicated statutory bodies with dedicated officers managing their housing boards.

“We hope to emulate them and to build up our expertise over the years with a similar model to oversee public housing as well as monitor the private housing sector.

“Under the federal constitution, housing comes under the common list [of federal and state jurisdictions] where state governments have the jurisdiction and power to set up a special body for housing.

“We need to have a dedicated statutory body with the power and jurisdiction especially for affordable housing.

“The board can introduce policies not only as a managing body for the public housing but as a policy making entity to fulfil the needs for housing and also to enforce policies for more affordable housing.

“The board will be the vehicle for us to jumpstart the process for more affordable housing in the state,” Wong added.
It is not immediately known how many employees would be deployed to manage the PHB.

The Singapore HDB is said to have over 4,000 employees while the HKHA is said to have double the number of staff.

Singapore HDB was set up 50 years ago, on Feb 1, 1960, during a housing crisis.

At that time, many were said to be living in unhygienic slums and crowded squatter settlements with only 9% of Singaporeans living in government flats.

Taking over from its predecessor, the Singapore Improvement Trust, HDB was tasked with solving the nation’s housing crisis.
HDB built 21,000 flats in less than three years and by 1965, it had built 54,000 flats. Within 10 years of its formation, the housing problem had been resolved.

HDB built cohesive communities within its towns with living environments provided including community spaces for residents.

Today, about 84% of Singaporeans are said to live in HDB flats. The latest rejuvenation programme undertaken is a 20- to 30-year plan to transform the HDB estates and towns into a world class living environment.

The HKHA on its part is the main provider of public housing in Hong Kong.

It was established in 1973 under the Housing Ordinance and is an agency of the government of Hong Kong. In the same year, the Resettlement Department and the Building Section of the Urban Services Department were merged to form the Housing Department, which acts as the Housing Authority’s executive body.

Aside from public housing, the HKHA is also responsible for the management of public rental housing estates, interim housing estates, transit centres, flatted factories and ancillary commercial and non-domestic facilities such as shopping centres, market stalls and car parks.

It also acts as the agent for the government when it comes to clearing land.

Hopefully, with a sole agency in charge of public housing, it will enable the state government to undertake more effective resource planning especially for affordable housing in the state.

With Penang being ranked on par with Kuala Lumpur as the eighth most livable city in Asia, the state government has expressed its wish to see more affordable housing for the middle income group.

To encourage developers to build more affordable housing, the state government has announced that it is reviewing the various charges imposed for projects with houses priced below either RM350,000 or RM300,000 for the island and either RM250,000 or RM220,000 for the houses on the mainland.

All this should augur well for both developers and the public. It is timely for the state government to regulate the housing sector and work via its agencies like the Penang Development Corporation (PDC) to build more affordable housing in the state instead of leaving the task to private developers.


This article appeared in The Edge Financial Daily, October 29, 2010.

Friday, November 05, 2010

Ceramah Perdana: RM100 bukan wang judi.


Speakers at the Ceramah Perdana in Kampung Melayu reiterated that the RM 100 for the Senior Citizens' program is not from gaming activities.

The Ceramah Perdana in Kampung Melayu (October 11, 2010) was attended by Adun Air Itam, YB Wong Hon Wai, Mat Sabu, Ustaz Roshidi and other PAS grassroots members.


Video by Edmund Lee, Citizen Journalist


Click here for the video

Thursday, November 04, 2010

3 Oral Questions in Penang State Assembly this round


The first agenda of the Penang State Assembly is oral questions session. It usually take 3 hours. This time around, 12 questions been answered. I answered three questions related to housing and town planning.

To view the debate online, please click this.

官商勾結致檳產業高漲 黃漢偉斥指責不實
北馬 2010-11-01 20:12
(檳城1日訊)檳州房屋委員會主席黃漢偉慎重否認,外界盛傳檳州政府與發展商勾結,以便抬高檳州產業價格的指責。他說,有關指控不知是由誰發出,但這番言論卻顯示出,有關人士對經濟並不熟悉。
“不只是檳城的屋價高漲,在吉隆坡和新山的屋價也一樣漲價,這是一個由發展商、承包商、銀行及有關當局操控的自由市場。所以有關指責是不實際的。”
黃漢偉週一在檳州立法議會上,針對光大區州議員黃偉益的附加提問,作出答覆。
此外,針對峇六拜州議員阿米魯丁提問,檳州的房屋有多少是由投機商控制時,黃漢偉表示,州政府沒有上述數據,或許中央銀行有進行相關研究。
他表示,州政府已發現一個新趨勢,許多發展商尤其是在東北縣,都趨向於興建豪華公寓,或者在州政府強制下興建中廉價屋。
“這已使到有意購買一間更舒適的屋子的人士,在檳島買屋的選擇有限。他們必須到威省才能買到,如果在浮羅山背,州政府也限制發展商必須興建特定模式的房屋,所以選擇不多。”
因此,他認為,州政府的房屋政策應更有彈性,才能滿足各階段人民的購屋需求和品味。

4步驟應對產業泡沫

另一方面,黃漢偉在回答巴當拉浪州議員陳宗興的口頭提問,有關州政府採取什麼措施,以避免州內出現“產業泡沫”的現象時表示,州政府已採取了4個應對步驟。
第一,在新的發展區提高新的房屋供應,例如在西南區、威北、威中及威南地區,一旦有了新屋供應,將能穩定市場的房價。
第二,州政府正探討發展商在檳島興建每單位低於35萬令吉房屋的特別費用,以鼓勵發展商建更多人民有能力購買的房子。
第三,檳島市政局於今年6月28日開始落實提高建築密度指南,以配合房屋現時的需求供應。
第四,從今年1月1日開始,規定外籍人士只能在檳城購買的房產,從原有的25萬令吉提高至50令吉。
黃漢偉補充,其他措施包括國家銀行及其他機構如財政部所控制的貸款利息、房屋貸款與獎掖等,也有助於減低“產業泡沫”的現象。

投機活動抬高產業價格

黃漢偉強調,發生在美國的“產業泡沫”現象,預料不會發生在檳城,因為產業價格高漲的情況只發生在一些特定地區,大部分都是平地產業及旺區。
他說,大部分產業被抬高價都是因為投機活動所致。
在2008年,檳州的房屋產業轉換共有1萬6284宗(價值達37億1800萬令吉),2009年有1萬6436宗(價值達約37億1900萬令吉)。今年首半年,就有8302宗(價值達約27億1800萬令吉)。
截至今年6月,檳城現有的房屋有34萬5875個單位,未來的房屋供應達4萬1218個單位,已策劃的房屋單位有3萬9007個。
他說,今年首6個月,已建好但未出售的房屋單位有509個,其中有255個單位是2至3層樓的房屋。
另外,黃漢偉也表示,東北縣的廉價組屋近3年的最低平均售價為2008年2萬令吉、2009年 2萬4000令吉及2010年的2萬3000令吉;而最高的平均售價為2008年175萬令吉、2009年170萬令吉及2010年的180萬令吉。

光明日報

Visit to Air Itam Market: Helping hawkers to update their particulars



Adun Air Itam YB Wong Hon Wai had visited several stalls at Air Itam Market to assist the traders about procedure renewal of licensing.



Video by Edmund Lee, Citizen Journalist. Click here for the full video







阿依淡巴剎44攤位未登記 市局合法化小販反應淡
2010-10-14 18:34

■黃漢偉州議員向阿依淡巴剎小販解釋作登記的重要性,並表示會協助他們申請執照。

(檳城14日訊)檳島市政局從7月1日起給予3個月寬限,讓非法承頂攤位的小販申請合法化,不過反應卻非常冷淡,阿依淡巴剎僅有10名小販向當局登記,尚有44個攤位小販仍未呈上資料。
阿依淡區州議員黃漢偉指出,該巴剎共有164個攤位,其中54個攤位小販屬於非執照持有人,根據市局的匯報顯示,到目前為止,只獲得10名小販申請,他相信是當局宣傳不足所造成。
疑10年未更新資料
他表示,這些小販之所以會成為非執照持有人,主要因素有幾個,第一是攤主過世,再者就是攤主年老,把家族生意交給妻子或孩子經營,第三個原因則是出現頂讓或轉租給他人。
“我相信當局已超過10年未更新小販名單資料,因此市局公共衛生小組推行登記運動,是希望把小販的資料重新處理,官員與小販溝通不良,未能獲取這方面的資訊,才導致反應冷淡。”
黃漢偉週四巡視阿依淡巴剎時如是指出,他嘗試介入協助解決小販問題,並在推行登記運動過程中,發現中介人坐享其成,從中謀取勞動階級人士的利潤,所以很多小販都向他作出投訴。
他表示,巡視巴剎的目的是要跟小販溝通,告訴他們登記運動的意義,同時其服務中心會提供援助,替小販填寫資料表格,所以他希望市局能夠考慮延長申請執照的寬限期。
此外,他也促請公共衛生小組官員除了聽取民聲之外,也要實地巡視巴剎,了解小販正在面對的問題,若能夠妥善解決,這樣小販就不必擔心被執法人員取締,也可杜絕中介人得益。

待投標結果決定承包商

掌管檳州房屋與城市及鄉村規劃委員會的黃漢偉透露,為期一個月的整頓及提升阿依淡巴剎計劃投標期限,已經在9月30日截止,不過市局還未開會決定承包商人選,因此有待鑑定投標結果。
同時,他也希望當局能夠吸取七條路巴剎提升工程進展欠佳,承包商遭到抨擊為借鏡,因此在篩選承包商方面,應該格外謹慎,並以負責任為選擇標準,避免影響該計劃的進度。

市議員應常巡視巴剎

另一方面,針對“檳城論壇”打算讓民眾公開票選明年度的10名檳島及威省市議員推薦人選一事,他認為,不管是政黨市議員或非政府組織市議員,都必須要經常下基層,巡視巴剎等。
他表示,雖然州議員和市議員擁有各自的工作崗位,但是身為州議員,還是必須要一併兼顧市政局的工作,因為他覺得官員與人民的溝通問題需要再進一步改善。
對於非政府組織市議員,他建議不應該只坐在會議廳內謀策略,發表政見,更要走出辦公室,拜訪巴剎小販,體驗這種生活經歷,千萬別閉門造車,才稱得上理想的市議員。